Going
into our second class, Shaunice and I thought that we had more of a grasp on
what to expect. However, it proved to be different than our expectation yet
again. Although this time the weather was in our favor, and we had a foundation
from the previous session, we still wound up with only a group of three people.
After communicating with our peers from the SLA class about the amount and type
of participation that they had, I assumed our class would be larger and contain
more varied levels of fluency. Before class we drew out some information from
our lesson plan focused on home and families. We restructured our lesson to
form a sort of “middle ground” amongst the different levels, while concentrating
on communicative competency. However, it turned out that all of the
participants were yet again advanced speakers, one of which had studied in the
U.S. for several months. This made our idea of a “middle ground” impractical. We
began the class with introductions as planned, then started in on the first
section of the lesson plan. In this brief warm up it was evident, by picking up
on cues from the learners that we needed to change our approach and go in a
different direction. We ended up using our initial lesson plan as more of an
outline for topics for conversation, adding several cultural references and
vocabulary along the way.
From the two
classes that we have hosted we have found that what we expected for this
experience was vastly different from what these students anticipated. Although
the class was advertised as intermediate, it is clear that we will have a majority
of advanced speakers throughout the program. I believe that this is due to the
fact that the general population of people that would want to attend a class
like this, have a genuine desire to learn the target English language. Without
having the opportunity to submerge themselves into an English-speaking culture,
these people are driven to find ways to advance their fluency and communicate
with native or expert speakers in other forums. This does however, prove their
willingness and motivation to learn. Through our class discussions we have
found this aspect to be a vital key in mastering a second language. So instead
of turning away from this new recognition, we will manipulate our strategy to
best suit the needs of this type of learner. We will create an environment for both learner-to-learner,
and teacher-to-learner interactions in which we can negotiate meaning. We will
create outlines based around pragmatic conversation, building their colloquial speech,
and downplaying some of the semantics that we had previously built our teaching
model around. Possibly centering discussion on a problem, role play interactions
and debates. In the case that we may have a lower level member join later down
the road, we will adapt and mold to that as necessary instead of the other way
around.
Role playing sounds like a very useful way to introduce/practice the pragmatics of language while allowing students the opportunity for "authentic" exchanges, to negotiate meaning. How will your class size affect role-playing activities? How will you structure them?
ResponderEliminar