domingo, 27 de octubre de 2013

Week one!

My first conversation hour at the Biblioteca Publica went very well, if a little differently than I expected. Although I had a lesson plan, it was far below the level of the students who attended my class. I went to the library thinking I would have eight moderate english speakers, but found thirteen (and one infant) students with a higher level. The lesson plan I had, which practiced introductions, daily activity, and personal interests, was not of a use to them as a whole. Instead I decided the many students would gain more from discussion with one another, as their levels varied person to person. This I facilitated, and helped to continue, gaining a feeling for the group so I may arrange more organized lessons for the future. I haven't got a partner, like the other people leading conversation groups. Something I found more difficult than I anticipated was the idea of intelligible input. I often found myself speaking using cognates, because I knew they would be understood more than words I would more regularly use. I need to keep in mind that possibly, with a high level group speaking in a regular way may be more advantageous than speaking in an intelligible way. I need to find different ways to break the groups up, and tell them what to speak about, and see if there is a better way I can help them. Another thing I didn't realize when going over class goals was the idea that I want the students to achieve what they want, and I want to tailor the time to suit their needs. I am going to try to work in more culture, more grammar, and more variation. It was a good start, and there remains room for improvement.

2 comentarios:

  1. It seems as though our class went in a very similar manner. Although our class had only two participants, we also found ourselves running into problems with the lesson plan. Our preconceived notions when walking into this new venture was quite different than what occurred. Like you, the level of English was much more advanced than we had anticipated. We ended up having to throw out our vocabulary and lesson plan, because it was much too basic for their language proficiency, and had to just wing it instead. Which although unarticulated, it went well. I think it is great that you were aware of the various levels of your learners and split them into pairs accordingly. This probably helped them to push one another rather than getting dominated or left behind in the class discussion. I will keep this in mind if we have a larger group in any of our upcoming classes. Sometimes small groups are more successful when learning a new language because of the intimacy. I also agree that a change in future lesson plans is entirely necessary in order to make this class valuable for such advanced speakers. These plans should be more focused on conversation, cultural references, pronunciation and grammar, and of course we will need to introduce a much wider range of topics to introduce when the content dulls. It’s evident that these speakers are at a point where they are looking to gain fluency in colloquial conversation.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Can a "regular" way be intelligible as well? How can you encourage conversation while creating opportunities for the acquisition of more advanced grammar skills? Getting feedback from students regarding needs and goals is essential.

    ResponderEliminar